Send us feedback on this entry »

Refresh

IATE ID: 1390890

Domain:
12 LAW proof [ LAW > justice > judicial proceedings ]
Cross-references:
is related to:
2149646
IATE ID: 2149646
bg:
връчване
cs:
doručování písemností
da:
forkyndelse af dokumenter
de:
Zustellung von Schriftstücken
en:
service of documents
es:
notificación de documentos
et:
dokumentide kätteandmine
dokumentide kättetoimetamine
fr:
signification ou notification des actes
ga:
seirbheáil doiciméad
hu:
iratkézbesítés
lt:
dokumentų įteikimas
mt:
notifika ta' dokumenti
nl:
betekening en kennisgeving van stukken
ro:
notificarea sau comunicarea actelor
sl:
vročanje pisanj
service of documents
is not to be confused with:
1618538
IATE ID: 1618538
da:
bundt
brevbundt
de:
Briefbund
Bund
el:
δέσμη
en:
bundle
es:
paquete
legajo
atado
fr:
liasse
it:
mazzetto
nl:
bundel
pt:
amarrado
atado
maço
sk:
zväzok
zväzok so zásielkami
sv:
bunt
brevbunt
bundle
Owner:
Consilium

Show more

Collapse

en English
Definition:
set of documents presented together for use in legal proceedings
Definition reference:
Note:

1. The set comprises the main documents on which legal arguments are based - such as, though not restricted to letters - and these are typically numbered and presented chronologically.

2. Not to be confused with 'bundle' [ IATE:1618538 ], which refers specifically to a bundle of letters and/or other postal items.

Owner:
Consilium

Show more

Collapse

Term:
bundle
Term reference:
UK.gov > Justice > Courts > Procedure rules > Civil > Rules & Practice Directions > PART 32 - EVIDENCE > PRACTICE DIRECTION 32 – EVIDENCE, https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32/pd_part32 [18.3.2016]
Term type:
term
Reliability:
★★★
Contexts:
Term in context:
Letters
12.1 Copies of individual letters should be collected together and exhibited in a bundle or bundles. They should be arranged in chronological order with the earliest at the top, and firmly secured.
12.2 When a bundle of correspondence is exhibited, the exhibit should have a front page attached stating that the bundle consists of original letters and copies. They should be arranged and secured as above and numbered consecutively.
Context reference:
UK.gov > Justice > Courts > Procedure rules > Civil > Rules & Practice Directions > PART 32 - EVIDENCE > PRACTICE DIRECTION 32 – EVIDENCE, https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32/pd_part32 [18.3.2016]
Language usage:

Two terms closely associated with 'bundles' are 'service of bundles' [ IATE:2149646 ] and 'lodging of bundles'.

Owner:
Consilium

Show more

Collapse

Term:
bundle of documents
Term type:
term
Reliability:
★★★
Contexts:
Term in context:

'2. Bundles of documents

2.1 It is desirable that a common bundle of documents is prepared for all cases (other than small claims) and they will be ordered for large, complex cases and multi unit claims. The bundle of documents must include all the documents parties will be seeking to rely on at the hearing or which may be referred to in questioning of witnesses. The bundle should not simply include all discovered documents.

2.2 Documents should be grouped where convenient with each grouping clearly divided and all pages indexed and number sequentially.'

Owner:
Consilium

Show more

Collapse

lv Latvian
Definition:
tādu dokumentu kopums, kas iesniegti vienkopus izmantošanai tiesvedībā
Definition reference:
ES Padomes LV terminologi, pamatojoties uz Council-EN
Owner:
Consilium

Show more

Collapse

Term:
dokumentu sakopojums
Term reference:
Priekšlikums Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulai, ar ko groza Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 1393/2007 par tiesas un ārpustiesas civillietu vai komerclietu dokumentu izsniegšanu dalībvalstīs ("dokumentu izsniegšana"), ST 9677 2020 ADD 1
Term type:
term
Reliability:
★★
Note:
Dokumenta teksts publiski vēl nav pieejams
Owner:
Consilium

Show more

Collapse

https://iate.europa.eu/entry/result/1390890
[Click to copy] [Forward by email]

https://iate.europa.eu/entry/result/1390890/en-lv
[Click to copy] [Forward by email]

Send us feedback on this entry »